ISLAMABAD – The accountability court-II on Thursday heard two corruption reference against former prime minister Nawaz Sharif and his sons after Islamabad High Court ordered to transfer the cases. Accountability court Judge Mohammad Arshad took up the Al-Azizia Steel Mills
ISLAMABAD – The accountability court-II on Thursday heard two corruption reference against former prime minister Nawaz Sharif and his sons after Islamabad High Court ordered to transfer the cases.
Accountability court Judge Mohammad Arshad took up the Al-Azizia Steel Mills and Flagship Investment, and offshore companies cases, while the same were earlier heard by Judge Mohammad Bashir, who had awarded sentences to former prime minister, his daughter Maryam Nawaz and son-in-law Captain (retd) Safdar in the Avenfield case.
As the hearing started, the judge asked the deputy prosecutor of the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) about the status of the case. Later, he adjourned the case and summoned Nawaz Sharif, who is serving his term in Adiala Jail following his conviction in the London flats case, on Monday.
Adjourning the case till Monday, the court also summoned Panamagate Joint Investigation Team head Wajid Zia.
The cases had been filed by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) following the Supreme Court order in the Panamagate case. The trial will be started from the point where the previous court had left it instead of new proceedings.
On Tuesday, the IHC approved an application seeking transfer of pending corruption references against disgraced prime minister Nawaz Sharif and his sons to any other court.
A division bench of the IHC, comprising Justice Aamer Farooq and Justice Miangul Hassan, issued the short order.
During the course of hearings, deposed premier’s counsel Khawaja Haris had argued that the references filed by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) against Sharif family members had a common witness a i.e. JIT head Wajid Zia, while the presiding judge of the accountability court, Judge Muhammad Bashir, had already disclosed his opinion on crucial aspects in all three references.
The counsel for the former ruling family winded up his arguments as to why Judge Muhammad Bashir should not proceed on the references filed against former premier Nawaz Sharif and his family members in the line of directives issued by the Supreme Court.
Nawaz’s counsel had filed an appeal requesting the court to transfer the Al-Azizia and Flagship Investment references from the court of Accountability Judge-I Mohammad Bashir to another accountability court.
As the hearing began, National Accountability Bureau’s (NAB) Additional Deputy Prosecutor General prosecutor Sardar Muzaffar Abbasi contended that the defence had earlier requested for a joint testimony of witnesses in all three corruption references against the Sharif family.
“The defence counsel cannot cross-examine joint witnesses,” Abbasi said.
The NAB prosecutor further noted that the statements of 342 accused persons in the case are yet to be recorded. “The defence will have time to make its case during the proceedings,” he added.
On July 6, an accountability court had sentenced Nawaz to a total of 11 years in prison and slapped a £8 million fine (Rs1.3 billion) in the corruption reference, while his daughter Maryam was sentenced to eight years with a £2 million fine (Rs335 million). Nawaz’s son-in-law Capt (retd) Safdar was also given a one-year sentence without any fine.
The Sharif family had also petitioned against their convictions in the Avenfield reference in which Nawaz Sharif was sentenced to 10 years in prison while his daughter Maryam Nawaz was imprisoned for 7 years.
IHC had clubbed the two references, which are being heard by a two-member bench comprising Justice Aamer Farooq and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb.