CJP Saqib Nisar rejects Nawaz Sharif's plea to club graft references
During an in-chamber hearing on Wednesday, the plea was dismissed for the third time as the same was rejected on Jan 4, 2108 and December 2, 2017.
The former premier had filed the plea against the objection raised by Registrar Office of the Supreme Court over the petition.
In his petition, Sharif had claimed that filing three separate references against him was "illegal, and violates the law and the Constitution, besides being violative of his [Sharif's] fundamental rights".
The petitioner had also urged the court to halt proceedings of the trial court until a single reference is filed. It also pleaded that direction issued in Panamagate verdict to the NAB regarding filing the three reference should be declared null and void.
The petition added that holding of several trials based on one allegation is against the basic rights of the petitioners.
At first, the same petition was rejected by the accountability court, which is hearing the corruption references against Sharif, his children - Maryam, Hassan and Hussain Nawaz - and son-in-law, Captain (retd) Safdar, on October 19 last year.
Aggrieved from the decision, Sharif moved the Islamabad High Court (IHC) taking up the matter of single trial in the references. The high court approving the plea directed the trial court to re-consider the application and gave a detailed verdict.
On November 8, the accountability court again take up the matter but rejected the plea citing that all references have different allegations.
He again moved the IHC against the verdict of the trial court and the former premier has to face the rejection.
NAB has filed three references against Nawaz Sharif and his children.
NAB’s Rawalpindi branch prepared references regarding the Azizia Steel Mills and nearly a dozen companies and made Nawaz Sharif and his sons respondents.
The bureau’s Lahore branch prepared a reference regarding Avenfield apartments in London in which the former premier, his three children and son-in-law have been made respondents.
The references were filed in the backdrop of Supreme Court’s July 28 decision in the Panama Papers case in which Nawaz Sharif was also disqualified for concealing his employment with Capital FZE, a firm owned by his younger son Hassan.
- Pakistan increases pensions of national cricketers by Rs100,00009:34 AM | 20 May, 2022
- FM Bilawal Bhutto defends ex-PM Imran’s Russia visit in US09:23 AM | 20 May, 2022
- Pakistan’s ex-foreign minister Sardar Asif Ahmad dies in Lahore09:00 AM | 20 May, 2022
- Today's currency exchange rates in #Pakistan - Dollar, Euro, Pound, ...08:26 AM | 20 May, 2022
- Today's gold rates in Pakistan – 20 May 202208:10 AM | 20 May, 2022
- Sunny Leone’s video of getting body massage goes viral06:50 PM | 19 May, 2022
- 'Willing to play Maryam Nawaz on-screen' – Saba Qamar reveals her ...05:55 PM | 19 May, 2022
- Yumna Zaidi and Merub Ali win hearts with latest video05:09 PM | 19 May, 2022
- Dollar hits all-time high at Rs19212:45 PM | 12 May, 2022
- Five best Pakistani YouTube channels that would make your Ramadan ...12:24 PM | 15 Apr, 2022
- Where does Pakistan stand in most powerful passport list in 2022? ...08:37 PM | 5 Apr, 2022
- International Women's Day - Pakistani women who made a mark globally!09:55 PM | 8 Mar, 2022