A World War III Scenario?

06:26 PM | 15 Apr, 2017
A World War III Scenario?
Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organised, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.

Woodrow Wilson, 28th President of the United States (1856-1924)

Unrestricted submarine warfare, unrestricted air bombing – this is total war. Time and the Ocean and some guiding star and High Cabal has made us what we are.

Winston Churchill’s reaction on the heavy aerial bombing of Rotterdam during World War II

Those who survive a nuclear war will envy the dead. Nikita Khrushchev

President Woodrow Wilson, whose education was paid for by the Zionist Freemasonic international bankers, was re-elected in 1916 on the slogan “He Kept America Out of the War.” These international bankers constitute the core of the High Cabal mentioned by Churchill. Although Wilson was voted in office to keep America out of war, he had, prior to his re-election, made a commitment to the High Cabal to take America into the First World War. Woodrow Wilson led America into the First World War on April 6, 1917.

Wilson’s statement quoted above reveals awareness of a hidden power elite, or High Cabal, some of whose agents, like Col. Edward Mandell House, were his handlers. This High Cabal drives mankind into perpetual bloodshed, confusion and chaos. Its strength resides in anonymity, secrecy, usury, concentration of wealth, and debt bondage of nations through war debts incurred in wars planned and instigated by them. A global slave state under their control, euphemistically called the New World Order, is the goal of this High Cabal.

Donald Trump, who was built by elements of the mafia early in his career, was elected on the slogan of bringing U.S. troops home, of disengaging the U.S. from wars abroad, and of having friendly relations with Russia. On April 6, 2017, exactly 100 years later to the date, Trump completely went against his campaign promises and attacked Syria, sending tremors among the global community.

This attack on Syria has raised the spectre of a highly probable global war, an immensely destructive WWIII. Is the choice of the date of the attack on Syria a coincidence? Or does it adumbrate the beginning of WWIII, a possibility often mentioned in literature pertaining to the hidden or secret societies?

On April 6, 2017 U.S. naval ships USS Porter and USS Ross launched 60 Tomahawk cruise missiles at al-Shayrat airbase inside Syria from the eastern Mediterranean. One of the missiles fell in the sea. The missiles were launched as punishment for the alleged and unproved use of chemical weapons by Syria on its own town named Khan Shaykhun.

They Syrians have denied using chemical weapons. In the past the jihadis backed by the U.S., UK and Israel have been known to have used chemical weapons. The U.S. sources claimed that 58 of the 59 missiles had hit the base whereas the Syrians claimed that more than half of the missiles had missed the target leaving its runways intact.

It is also important, in view of the gathering war clouds, to point out that the accuracy of military weapons is not as great as is touted by the military industrial complex. A stray nuclear weapon can cause havoc in unintended locations. It is an important piece of information, first revealed publicly by U.S. intelligence officer Col. L. Fletcher Prouty, that of the 5000 helicopters lost by the U.S. in Vietnam, 43% just fell out of the sky without enemy fire. Manufacturing defects can plague all strategic and non-strategic weapons.

The illegal attack by the U.S. on a Syrian airbase could have led to deaths of, or injury to, Russian and / or Iranian personnel stationed in Syria on the request of the Syrian government. The attack immediately reversed Trump’s pre-election stance of getting out of mid-east wars and escalated matters in the direction of a highly enhanced U.S. military commitment in Syria. There has been talk of sending an additional 150,000 U.S. troops to the region!

The Russians have reacted very strongly to the U.S. attack, both diplomatically and in physical terms. Mr. Putin has denounced the American attack as “an illegal act of aggression.” Russia has suspended the US-Russia Memorandum of Mutual Understanding that was meant to avoid clashes or collisions between Russian and U.S. aircraft over Syrian territory. Russia has also announced that it will immediately strengthen Syria’s air defences.

The Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev has stated that the U.S. attack has “completely ruined” relations between the U.S. and Russia and that the two countries had “come within an inch” of direct military clash on account of the airstrike. He accused America of “barely avoiding combat clashes with Russia.”

On April 12, five hours of talks in Moscow between the U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and the Russian President Putin, as well as the Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, ended with their differences unresolved. In fact, the Russian Foreign Minister categorically rejected any “false choice, such as ‘you are either with us or against us’.”

The Russians also stated that the Nusra was being protected by the Americans. Mr. Lavrov said: “We have a persistent suspicion, which no one has yet been able to dispel, that Nusra is still being guarded in order to use Plan B at some point and try to overthrow the regime of Bashar-al-Assad by force.” By Plan B the Russian minister obviously meant that in case the “jihadi” proxies of U.S. and Israel failed to bring about regime change in Syria the Americans would do it as they did in Iraq.

The Russians have, in the wake of this illegal attack, dispatched a cruise-missile armed frigate (Admiral Grigorovich) and two Steregushchiy-class corvettes, capable of launching long range cruise missiles, to the eastern Mediterranean, where they will join six other Russian warships and support vessels. This is a very grave situation.

It is highly important to note that there have been aggressive encounters between Iranian speedboats and U.S. vessels in the Persian Gulf during the first months of 2017 as well as in late 2016. On January 9, 2017 CNN reported that the USS Mahan had to fire warning shots as Iranian speed boats came within 900 yards of it in the Strait of Hormuz.

It was reported on March 6, 2017 that a swarm of Iranian speedboats came within 600 yards of an American navy ship USNS Invincible and forced it to change course. Invincible is classified as a “missile range scientific instrumentation ship” by the U.S. Navy.

It was probably carrying out espionage regarding Iranian missile tests. The U.S. Navy is now acutely aware of the danger posed by swarms of Iranian boats and has reportedly tested A 10 Warthog guns and precision guided munitions to be dropped from jets on Iranian speed boats.

It is therefore clear that tension is high and adrenalin is flowing in the Persian Gulf. Further Trump’s dislike of Iran is no secret. The US. representative to the UN has stated that her country needs to get Iranian influence out of Syria. This sends a very dangerous signal to Iran. Syrian state media has reported that Russia and Iran are ready to meet any attack on Syria.

In the Far East the victory of a political leadership in Taiwan that seeks independence from China and enjoys complete U.S. backing, has complicated things very dangerously. The situation has led Chinese military leaders to remark that if Taiwan sought independence from China it would mean war. In fact, Mr. Trump had stated just before assuming office, that all cards regarding China were on the table and that included the One China policy.

This led the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman to issue a statement: “There is only one China in the world, Taiwan is an inalienable region of China, and the government of the People’s Republic of China is the only legitimate government representing China. . . The ‘One China’ principle, which is the political foundation of China-U.S. relations, is non-negotiable.”

Simultaneously the U.S. is putting pressure on North Korea and signalling that it will attack North Korea if it tests a nuclear weapon. The Sino-North Korean ties are quite strong. Also it was diplomatically offensive to attack Syria while the visiting Chinese Premier was having dinner with Mr. Trump. The U.S. leaders are doing their best to provoke North Korea. U.S. media and agencies behind the media have already built a hysteria about North Korea. John McCain called the North Korean leader Kim Jong un a “crazy fat kid.”

John McCain does not enjoy much respect internationally and he would do well to scrutinize the language, conduct and level of discourse his own President. In an interview given before he became President, Mr. Trump, who did not serve in Vietnam, referred to the dangers inherent in his womanizing as his Vietnam. He further elaborated that for him every v….. (name of female organ) was a possible landmine on account of the high possibility of catching some lethal disease! He said he was “incredibly lucky” that he did not catch any disease. With such a man sitting atop the world’s greatest nuclear arsenal, and with neocons and Zionists around him, the world will almost certainly see widespread war and destruction.

On April 13th the U.S. tested a Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB) weapon in Afghanistan. MOAB weapon was dropped on what was claimed to be a network of caves. According to James Cougan MOAB “ was not only intended to test the effectiveness of the bomb, but to demonstrate that the US military does not need to use nuclear weapons to attack underground bunker complexes. After the MOAB test Trump gloated: “I don’t know if this sends a message to North Korea. It doesn’t make any difference if it does or not. “ He added that North Korea “is a problem – the problem will be taken care of.”

The United States has proceeded to make full preparation for an attack on North Korea. On Friday April 14, James Cogan has described in detail the state of U.S. preparedness for the North Korean war. We quote him at length so that the reader may be able to form an informed opinion about how far things have gone:

“Hundreds of thousands of South Korean troops, and some 30,000 Americans, are in a state of high readiness, using the annual Foal Eagle military exercises as the cover for their preparations. Among the American units in South Korea is the elite assassination squad that killed Osama bin Laden in 2011.

“Decapitation” raids to assassinate North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un and other senior regime figures are an official part of US military planning.

Naval destroyers and an unknown number of nuclear submarines are hovering off the Korean coast, armed with the same Tomahawk cruise missiles used to attack a Syrian airbase one week ago. The aircraft carrier Carl Vinson and its strike group has been dispatched to join them. Dozens of US strike aircraft are based at airfields in Japan and South Korea. B-1 strategic bombers are operating from Guam, where the Obama administration deployed them last year. A squadron of 12 F-22 “Stealth” fighters were quietly moved in February to northern Australia, from where they could deploy rapidly to the peninsula.”

On Friday 14th April the Chinese Foreign Ministry issued, what the New York Times called an “unusually blunt” statement on the U.S.-North Korea standoff. Quoting the Chinese news agency Xinhua, the New York Times reported that the Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi had said: “The United States and South and North Korea are engaging in tit for tat, with swords drawn and bows bent, and there have been storm clouds gathering. If they let war break out on the peninsula, they must shoulder the historical culpability and pay the price for this.”

The arrogance, the hubris of those who control America, and of those who act as their mouthpieces, is revolting. The U.S. representative to the UN, Nikki Haley, told a CNN interviewer that nothing was “off the table” when it came to sanctions against Russia and Iran. So nothing is off the table when it comes to dealing with Russia and Iran and with China! In fact, Nikki Haley also said: “I was trying to warn the Security Council and the international community that (Trump) won’t stop here. If he needs to do more he will do more.” The hubris is only exceeded by their ability to lie to the whole world and to cheat. Nikki Haley said: “We saw the evidence. The President saw the evidence. All of that is naturally classified.”

It was the so-called leadership of the U.S. and the U.K. which saw the evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, which saw evidence of chemical weapons in Iraq, evidence of “biological weapons factories on wheels and on rails”, saw evidence of Saddam’s links with AlQaeda, etc. As Jim Fetzer, founder of scholars for 9/11 Truth movement stated: “According to the Centre for Public Integrity, prominent members of the administration made nearly 1000 lies to induce Americans to support a war in Iraq. These were made by George Bush, Richard Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and others.”

In a report published in 2008 by the Centre for Public Integrity, it has been demonstrated that on 935 occasions the American officials “stated unequivocally that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction (or was trying to produce or obtain them), links to AlQaeda, or both. This concerted effort was the underpinning of the Bush administration’s case for war.”

Donald Trump and members of his team have joined the ranks of these illustrious luminaries of the lying American leaders. Now they are making a concerted effort to wage war in Syria since their stooges, the ISIS et al have failed to remove Bashar al Assad.

Had there been credible evidence in the hands of the U.S. authorities it would have been trumpeted before the whole world. The withholding of the so-called evidence is an indication that they are afraid that their lie will be caught before they can wage a full scale war in Syria. They have previous experience of having their lies exposed. In 2013 also the U.S. had planned to invade Syria on the pretext that she had used chemical weapons.

However, it turned out that chemical weapons had been used by the U.S. allied “Islamic” groups, some of which are controlled by Israel. The chemical attack had been planned and orchestrated by the U.S. military. Hacked correspondence of U.S. Army Col. Anthony Jamie MacDonald confirmed this. Col. MacDonald was the general staff director of the deputy chief of staff for army intelligence.

Carla Del Ponte, the head of the UN mission in 2013, also confirmed that militants were responsible for the use of Sarin gas. Further, chemical weapons bearing extremists were caught on video. So this time around the American regime is not willing to go for a UN investigation, nor is it willing to reveal any information pertaining to the alleged use of chemical weapons by Assad. In fact, all chemical weapons have been removed from Syria in an operation supervised by OPCW – Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. The operation was completed in January 2015.

The former IAEA head Hans Blix told RT: “It would have been desirable to have an impartial investigation of the attack first, as they were discussing in the Security Council.” He was referring to Russian effort in the Security Council. Russia wanted to have an impartial inquiry before any action. But Trump ordered the attack while the discussions were going on.

Blix, it may be recalled, became world famous when he resisted American pressures and allowed his team of inspectors to work impartially in Iraq. His team reported that no weapons of mass destruction existed in Iraq, delivering a slap in the face of the American leaders who had lied to their own people, and to the whole world. Blix further reminded the U.S. leadership and the rest of the world: “The UN Charter prohibits the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity of other states. And the U.S. is not at war with Syria. So they should not attack them.” Blix also pointed out that “In the time when big power ignores the Security Council and ignores the Charter, they are also undermining the organization, and that is also regrettable.”

It was pointed out by Col. L. Fletcher Prouty, who was the liaison officer between the CIA and the military for clandestine CIA operations and had a desk in the White House from 1954-1963, that the decision to wage war in Korea and Vietnam was taken by the “power elite” even before WWII had ended.

He has also pointed out that the globe is regarded as a real estate by this High Cabal and that its agenda has a Malthusian genocidal component. Decisions for all major wars are taken by the High Cabal. It is highly pertinent to quote Guido Preparata, who was thrown out of his job in USA, and who was ostracised by his colleagues, for establishing beyond reasonable doubt Britain and US, controlled by the

High Cabal, built Hitler and the Third Reich. He writes:

“The so-called ‘democratic constituency’ which represents to date the most sophisticated model of oligarchic rule, the electorate wield no clout whatever, and political ability is but another expression for the powers of persuasion needed to ‘build consensus’ around (momentous) decisions already taken elsewhere.”

The decision for a major global conflagration has been taken elsewhere already. The High Cabal controls Washington and London absolutely. Douglass Reed, at one time a world famous British correspondent, was forced into oblivion by agents of the High Cabal and his books removed from all libraries. In 1956, after years of research, he completed a monumental book titled The Controversy of Zion.

He knew the book would certainly not be published in his lifetime because it challenged the historical narrative erected by the establishment academia, working as hirelings of the High Cabal. The manuscript remained with him until his death in South Africa in 1978. After his death his book was published and has been brought out of complete obscurity by the internet in recent years. His conclusion is as follows (his emphasis):

“The conspiracy for world dominion through a world slave state exists and cannot at this stage be abruptly checked or broken off; of the momentum it has acquired it must now go on to fulfilment or failure. Either will be destructive for a time, and hard for those of the time in which the denouement comes."

In case someone thinks that nuclear war is foolish the wise words of former U.S. Secretary of Treasury Paul Craig Roberts, written on October 24, 2016, can be eye-opening: Many foolish people believe nuclear war cannot happen, because there is no winner. However, American war planners, who elevated nuclear weapons from a retaliatory role to a pre-emptive first strike function, obviously do not agree that nuclear war cannot be won."