Search

Is time up for the Indus Water Treaty?

Naveed Ahmad 05:41 PM | 24 Mar, 2017
Is time up for the Indus Water Treaty?
India has expectedly backtracked from its recent pledge to continue deliberations on Islamabad’s objection to its recent projects on the rivers allocated as per the Indus Water Treaty (IWT). Since Delhi is not willing to accept World Bank’s arbitration, thus the April meeting in Washington DC is improbable. The Indian government took only a couple of days to renege from its vow given in Islamabad and Lahore this week.

Last September when Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi threatened to scrap the IWT, Pakistan stated that such a move would tantamount to a ‘declaration of war’.

The World Bank, which had mediated in 1960, is the guarantor of the Indus Water Treaty. In accordance with the treaty - sponsored by the UK, Germany, Australia, New Zealand and Canada - India and Pakistan were given control of three rivers each, originating from Jammu and Kashmir.

On April 1, 1948, Delhi halted the flow of water from the canals on its side. By early May, it had signed the Inter-Dominion Agreement with Pakistan, allowing the continuation of water supplies for irrigation purposes until the newly formed country developed alternative water resources. Delhi blocked the water supply to Pakistan to assert its military control of Jammu & Kashmir which Kashmiris as well as Pakistanis rejected.

Later, Indian Premier Jawaharlal Nehru invited American expert David E Lilienthal to survey the situation. Lilienthal’s determinations favored Pakistan’s position, thus failed to win Delhi’s support. The matter remained unresolved as the WB sponsored several rounds of talks in Washington from 1952 to 1960. The pact allocated the eastern rivers (Ravi, Sutlej and Beas) to India and the western rivers (Jhelum, Chenab and Sindh) to Pakistan.

In his bid to ‘deny every drop of water to Pakistan,’ Modi is personally overseeing two controversial hydropower projects — Kishanganga and Ratle — against which Islamabad seeks International Court of Arbitration through the global financial institution. In sync with its ongoing effort to oust UN Military Observers’’ Group in India and Pakistan along the Line of Control by denying access and opposing its presence, it now aims to trash the Indus Water Treaty. India’s decade old multipronged strategy is aimed at voiding all existing multilateral references to disputed status of Jammu and Kashmir. There’s no denying of that fact that India is predicted to be an enormously water-starved country in the future. Pakistan too face a similar risk.

Last year, the BJP-led government revived plan to resume constructing a 439-feet-long and 40-feet-wide barrage at the mouth of the Wular Lake on the Jhelum River near the town of Sopore in Indian-occupied Kashmir to suck away 4,000 cusecs, which as per IWT must go to Pakistan. It’s the same project, India had to shelve the plan in 1987 due to objections from Pakistan. In 1992, it started work on Baglihar Dam on the Chenab River against the spirit of the IWT. Lacking due homework and technically sound team, Islamabad spent eight years in talks with Delhi but without any fruit. The matter remained unresolved through bilateral talks till 2004 when Pakistan sought World Bank’s arbitration, which resulted in certain design changes India accepted and implemented through further negotiations by 2010. However, the Modi government has consistently rejected any prospects of arbitration while threatening to annul the decades’ old deal.

For years, Indian strategic thinkers such as PR Chari have supported quashing the existing arrangement. Dr Chari even went as far as saying that “negotiating Indus Water Treaty 2 will be a huge confidence building measure as it would help economic integration of the two countries”. The BJP cabinet sees no economic integration but coercion of any dissenting neighbor be it Nepal, Sri Lanka or Pakistan.

However, the question really is if the existing treaty can address the challenges India’s posing by constructing newer reservoirs or diverting rivers through canals in the name of Jammu & Kashmir’s economic development.

Legally speaking, none of its 12 articles and eight annexes provide India the right to construct a certain number of dams. The IWP only spells out technical specifications about the reservoir permitted to be built. Thus, the accord's clauses concerning dispute resolution can Pakistan if it invokes them on technical parameters of the lake.

Learning from the past blunders ranging from lack of handy expertise about the treaty’s application in various scenarios to picking a slow and costly process of appointment of neutral expert, Islamabad must adopt a more pro-active approach. Considering India’s foot-dragging policy, Pakistan may consider seeking its right as lower riparian under the principles of customary international law. Islamabad has not gone this route before but prominent experts of international law find it more promising.

Besides his legal competence, the option of inviting a neutral expert is also susceptible to external influence. Over the years, India has invested in its clout in the World Bank. Just last year, it became the seventh largest shareholder in the World Bank with a better voting share in its affair. India's voting power now rests at 2.91 percent while China's at 4.42 percent. Due to anti-China posturing, India has been winning western support at the global multilateral institutions. Thus, without giving up on arbitration option, Islamabad may also launch diplomatic and political offensive in the light of IWT provisions as well as being a lower riparian, raising environmental and food safety concerns. The existing yearly data already suggests water inflow has been decreasing vis-a-via the precipitation received in catchment areas.

Since Modi has made India easier to decipher, the prospects of a limited conflict over Jammu & Kashmir seem more real now than in the past decade. Deployment of advanced military assets and troops on forward cantonments and bases along the Line of Control and the Working Boundary are in sync with Delhi’s adventurism to test its Cold Start Doctrine while trashing the IWT through violative actions and denial of its conflict-resolution mechanisms.

The recent visit of Indian officials for water talks was probably aimed at deciphering the Pakistani approach ahead. Jammu and Kashmir has become more bothersome for India as the economic corridor to China passing through Pakistan’s Northern Areas.

By showcasing its own military preparedness and test-firing various types of delivery systems, Islamabad has been reacting to Indian intentions as well as bids to offset balance of power through acquisition of the latest offensive and defensive military hardware. Delhi can’t call Pakistan’s bluff on the IWT as the agrarian nation won’t be divided if stripped off its vital arteries.

Since the BJP victory in Uttar Pardesh and his shocking pick for its chief minister, Modi has signaled the intent to deliver on those Hinduva pledges than assuming a more statesmanlike role. Delhi has already hinted at shelving the no-first-use nuclear doctrine. If World Bank or other international actor passively look on as tension spikes in South Asia, India’s hardliner war-king may get more than he bargained for.

Naveed Ahmad
Naveed Ahmad

The writer is a distinguished investigative journalist and academic with extensive reporting experience in the Middle East and North Africa. He specializes in matters concerning security, diplomacy and governance.

Advertisement

KARACHI - Following are the foreign currency exchange rates for US Dollar, Saudi Riyal, UK Pound Sterling, U.A.E. Dirham, European Euro, and other foreign currencies in Pakistan open market on February 5, 2023 (Sunday).

Source: Forex Association of Pakistan. (last update 09:00 AM)

Currency Symbol Buying Selling
US Dollar ‎USD 280.9 284.25
Euro EUR 299 302
UK Pound Sterling GBP 335 338
U.A.E Dirham AED 75.14 75.44
Saudi Riyal SAR 73.55 73.85
Australian Dollar AUD 192 194
Bahrain Dinar BHD 712.72 720.72
Canadian Dollar CAD 205 207
China Yuan CNY 39.67 40.07
Danish Krone DKK 39.33 39.73
Hong Kong Dollar HKD 34.19 34.54
Indian Rupee INR 3.28 3.39
Japanese Yen JPY 2.5 2.54
Kuwaiti Dinar KWD 878 887
Malaysian Ringgit MYR 62.83 63.43
New Zealand Dollar NZD 173.25 175.25
Norwegians Krone NOK 26.79 27.09
Omani Riyal OMR 696.08 704.08
Qatari Riyal ‎QAR 73.62 74.32
Singapore Dollar SGD 204 206
Swedish Korona SEK 25.61 25.91
Swiss Franc CHF 291.69 294.19
Thai Bhat THB 8.15 8.3

KARACHI – The price of a single tola of 24-karat gold in Pakistan is Rs 205,300 on Sunday. The price of 10 grams of 24k gold was recorded at Rs176,010.

Likewise, 10 grams of 22k gold were being traded for Rs167,318 while a single tola of 22-karat gold was being sold at Rs 195,157.

Note: The gold rate in Pakistan is fluctuating according to the international market so the price is never been fixed. The below rates are provided by local gold markets and Sarafa Markets of different cities.

City Gold Silver
Lahore PKR 205,300 PKR 2,360
Karachi PKR 205,300 PKR 2,360
Islamabad PKR 205,300 PKR 2,360
Peshawar PKR 205,300 PKR 2,360
Quetta PKR 205,300 PKR 2,360
Sialkot PKR 205,300 PKR 2,360
Attock PKR 205,300 PKR 2,360
Gujranwala PKR 205,300 PKR 2,360
Jehlum PKR 205,300 PKR 2,360
Multan PKR 205,300 PKR 2,360
Bahawalpur PKR 205,300 PKR 2,360
Gujrat PKR 205,300 PKR 2,360
Nawabshah PKR 205,300 PKR 2,360
Chakwal PKR 205,300 PKR 2,360
Hyderabad PKR 205,300 PKR 2,360
Nowshehra PKR 205,300 PKR 2,360
Sargodha PKR 205,300 PKR 2,360
Faisalabad PKR 205,300 PKR 2,360
Mirpur PKR 205,300 PKR 2,360

Advertisement

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Sign up for Newsletter